I personally don’t care anymore because these greedy corporations aren’t our friends. And in the next 6 months to a year they will hire a bunch of people to pick up the slack now that they have twice as much work but half the amount of people to do the work. In all my years working in the corporate work reductions in HR, marketing, TI, accounting, back office and even R&D are some of the first things to happen in a merge or buyout. But you can be sure that a chunk of them definitely were. So for the corporate overlords the question is why keep both departments if you can cut costs and allocate some personnel and all the work to a single one? Given the sheer amount of firings, I personally doubt that all the positions elimitated were redundant. Every "support" role probably existed in both companies and basically did the same or a very similar job. And it's really not that hard to understand. That is literally one of the first things that happens every time a company buys or absorbs another. I mean, they definitely fired what the corporate calls redundant positions. Also your original comment was about dementia, nowhere does this article or any study show there is any truth to that at ALL, so my point about disinformation stands, your just throwing people into fear and/or guilt based on nothing but assumptions. it's the same in all these studies go read them for yourself instead of throwing them around from a biased journalistic site that makes something seem like it was proven when in fact, it was not. Behavioral addictions form a largely unexplored field of study.' There's your answer, sample bias, not enough research etc. Common problems include: sample bias, the search for diagnostic instrumentals, opposing approximations to the matter, and the fact that this entity may be encompassed inside a greater pathology (i.e., sex addiction) that may present itself with very diverse symptomatology. However, despite all efforts, we are still unable to profile when engaging in this behavior becomes pathological. Then when you look at the actual study it says 'In the last few years, there has been a wave of articles related to behavioral addictions some of them have a focus on online pornography addiction. Dunno why I can't reply to your other reply below mine but the article you posted proposes harsh statements that the studies that it links to do not back up at ALL, have you checked any of these studies instead of just blindly accepting them cause they fit your perspective? For example, the article states that porn can cause hypofrontality, damage to the prefrontal cortex in adulthood is termed hypofrontality, which predisposes an individual to behave compulsively and make poor decisions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |